top of page

Google Classroom, Reorganized

Aligning digital course organization with real classroom rhythms.
This project explores a weekly-based structure for organizing course materials, helping students find what they need faster and follow the flow of class more clearly.

Role

Product Designer 

Duration

4 weeks

Team

Solo Project

1 mentor

Tools & Skills

Figma

UX Research

Workflow architecture
UI system

Frame 4.jpg
5e636adc7c88e99bf0a82a2f6c713fab_edited.jpg
Studio-based, laptop-centric courses rely on predictable weekly structure.

SOLUTION overview

PROBLEM

Structural Friction

When digital structure does not align with classroom rhythm:

  • Time is spent searching rather than learning.

  • Weekly continuity is disrupted.

  • Navigation patterns must be relearned.

RESEARCH

Research Methods

Think Aloud Interviews · Observations · Upload Pattern Review

problem_01

Mental Model Mismatch

Students recall coursework week-by-week, while Google Classroom organizes content by file type and chronology.

“When I try to review Week 5, I end up scrolling through everything.”

— MDes Student Interview

This misalignment leads to:

→ Fragmented navigation across materials and assignments
→ Increased scrolling
→ Reduced clarity in weekly workflows

Problem_02

Cross-Instructor Inconsistency

Instead of navigating a predictable system, students adapt to individual instructor habits.

“Every professor organizes things differently.”

— MDes Student Interview

When upload structures vary across instructors, students need to relearn navigation patterns each semester.

→ Naming conventions
→ Grouping logic
→ Posting order

Goal

Redesign course organization to align digital structure with classroom rhythm and reduce cross-course variability.

solution

Standardized Upload Structure

A unified upload pattern that organizes materials by:

​Week → Topic → Materials → Assignments

Three behavioral patterns 

01.  Students recall coursework week-by-week.

02. Upload variability reduces predictability.

03. Materials and tasks are experienced as a

      continuous flow.

Three structural shifts:

01.  A week-based primary navigation

02. A standardized weekly hierarchy

03. A milestone-aligned project structure

Design decisions

Redesign course organization to align digital structure with classroom rhythm and reduce cross-course variability.

Key Insights_01

Students recall coursework week-by-week.

Design Decision_01

​Introduce Week-Based Navigation Tabs.

  • Weekly tabs surface content chronologically.

  • Each week acts as a predictable unit of organization.

  • Reduces reliance on scrolling through mixed content.

Pink Poppy Flowers
Pink Poppy Flowers
Pink Poppy Flowers
Pink Poppy Flowers

Key Insights_02

Upload patterns vary across instructors, reducing predictability.

Different naming conventions, grouping logic, and posting orders force students to relearn navigation patterns each semester.

Design Decision_02

Create system-level consistency,
Standardize the upload hierarchy:
Week → Materials → Assignments

  • Materials and assignments follow the same structure across courses.

  • Weekly grouping reduces structural variability.

  • Predictable layout improves navigation clarity.

Pink Poppy Flowers
Pink Poppy Flowers

Key Insights_03

Digital structure should align with in-class workflow.

Studio courses follow a natural rhythm: research, iteration, critique, presentation. Digital organization should reflect that progression.

Design Decision_03

01.

Bundle materials & assignments within each week

  • Maintains in-class continuity

  • Prevents fragmentation between resources and tasks

02.

Introduce Milestone-Based Project Structure

  • Aligns project phases with academic progression

  • Makes long-term work reflect classroom pace

  • Separates project flow from weekly content

KakaoTalk_Photo_2025-12-08-23-00-35 003.png
Pink Poppy Flowers

Impact

Before

Content grouped by file type and chronology

After

Content structured by week and milestone progression

REFLECTION

Structural Thinking

Within Product Constraints

This project reshaped how I approach usability problems.
The friction students experienced was not a surface-level interface issue, but a structural misalignment between classroom rhythm and digital organization.

Designing within the constraints of an existing SaaS platform required focusing on structural consistency rather than visual redesign.

What I learned

01. Consistency can reduce cognitive effort without increasing complexity.

02. Alignment with real-world behavior creates more intuitive systems.

03. Meaningful improvement can emerge from reorganizing existing

       components, not expanding functionality.

bottom of page